Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramnagar,Alapur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:58, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ramnagar,Alapur[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced list of non-notable businesses (with phone numbers). WP:NOTDIRECTORY Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:09, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Withdrawn by nominator Given how the article has changed over the past week while I was away, I would support withdrawing the nomination. Most of the unsourced list of schools and hospitals should be removed and the article kept as a stub. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 13:48, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - test page, no context, whatecer. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is an article about a tehsil or possibly the town that forms the core of the tehsil. All towns and counties are notable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:45, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep towns, villages and land marks are generally kept per WP:NPLACE. And in this case the town/village actually exists. Coordinates were also provided. Ahecht the list are not businesses, they are schools and no phone number or such exists anymore. That means, WP:NOTDIRECTORY doesn't applies anymore. RHaworth, this article doesn't meet any of the speedy deletion criteria so can you please think again?? Jim Carter (from public cyber) 08:05, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have moved the article from Ramnagar,Alapur to Ramnagar, Alapur. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 08:08, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also remember, the article is about an Indian town/village so per WP:IKI sources are not quite available online. If you won't get significant coverage online that doesn;t mean the subject is not notable. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 10:17, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep real place per WP:GEOLAND. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:36, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:INDAFDKI, the evidence of its existence can be gained at here. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 13:53, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.