Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramesh matiala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:33, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ramesh matiala[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be an unremarkable local politician: has won a municipal ward seat. The only editor doesn't seem to be willing or able to write encyclopedically, and as it stands it is not informative. Slashme (talk) 08:17, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:26, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:27, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:27, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. City councillors don't pass WP:NPOL, though this is a very large city. Notability not established by sources in the article, it isn't an obvious pass in my BEFORE (it might be, might not) - and article is in a state where TNT wouldn't be a bad thing. Icewhiz (talk) 12:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Delhi is a large enough city that a city councillor could be accepted as passing WP:NPOL #2 if the article were written and sourced properly — but no political office, not even an "inherently" notable one like the presidency of an entire country, entitles its holders to keep an article that's written and sourced like this. Bearcat (talk) 20:20, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above Spiderone 10:35, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.