Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ram Lakhan (2016 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 00:44, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ram Lakhan (2016 film)[edit]

Ram Lakhan (2016 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no relevant sources, crystal ball, looks as created by the production company The Banner talk 02:46, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:24, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:24, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't know that it was necessarily created by them. In any case, I found mentions about a remake of the older film by the same name, but they appear to be completely separate films. ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5]) I'm mentioning this here mostly because it would be easy to confuse the two. I myself thought that it might be the same film but with a different director brought on board until I saw the news story about the casting for the remake, which is completely different from the casting for this film. If we had a good redirect target I'd endorse a redirect, but there doesn't seem to be one - the person formerly linked to from the article is a political figure, not a director. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Music1201 talk 16:08, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I'm not sure I'd instantly taint this with the COI brush. I initially missed the edits on Nirahua Entertainment Private Limited which, along with this article, make up the majority of this contributor's edits. That page in particular is promotional in tone. However I thought Times of India was a reliable source? Not sure how the infobox has been populated - far too much unsourced info in there. Rayman60 (talk) 18:54, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dane2007 (talk) 21:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final Relist -- Dane2007 talk 22:23, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane2007 talk 22:23, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.