Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ram Charitra
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete without prejudice. Poorly sourced BLP. I won't restore this version of the article but if someone wants to create a sourced neutral article on this subject then go for it. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:53, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ram Charitra[edit]
- Ram Charitra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can find no significant coverage of this Fijian civil servant which would satisfy the general notability guideline. The first source in the article has a few passing mentions confirming that Charitra was a friend of Sathi Narain, and the second is another passing mention saying that he was appointed to the committee organising Fiji's independence celebrations. Neither of those positions comes close to conferring notability per any of the special guidelines. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:26, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:47, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:48, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unable to find significant information to establish notability. Possible conflict of interest with article subject and author. Barkeep Chat | $ 17:24, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:44, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.