Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Lorigo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 18:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ralph Lorigo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a political figure whose only substantive claim of notability is being the chairman of a local chapter of a political party, which cites not one shred of reliable source coverage to demonstrate why he should have an article in an encyclopedia (its only source is the local chapter's own website, a primary source that cannot confer notability.) This is not a claim that passes WP:POLITICIAN, needless to say. I would in fact have speedied this, except that there's already a disputed prod in the edit history. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 16:54, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Straight failure of GNG, with no applicable Special Notability Guidelines. Carrite (talk) 22:37, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable politician with no significant coverage.68.232.186.227 (talk) 22:22, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing notable here, no reliable references.Jacona (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.