Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rakesh Adukia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:24, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rakesh Adukia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to satisfy WP:ANYBIO, WP:FILMMAKER or WP:SIGCOV. The only references are that he is involved in Fraud (the reference cited is not even verified by CNN) and that he was an officer in a company that was named in the Panama Papers, which is hardly notable. No hits on GNEWS - the only sources I could find when I searched are LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter and personal blogs. Dan arndt (talk) 01:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC) Dan arndt (talk) 01:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 01:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:22, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:22, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Through WP:INDAFD: Rakesh Adukia Karma Production

Delete for failing WP:BASIC through no coverage in reliable sources. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 22:07, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 01:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as sourced for fraud rather than film production and that is WP:ONEEVENT Atlantic306 (talk) 19:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.