Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raju Gauli

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:17, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Raju Gauli[edit]

Raju Gauli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable cinematographer. This has been draftified once already, so there is little point in doing so again. It obviously cannot be improved in Draft space. WP:BEFORE has been unable to suggest references that are useful. Fiddle Faddle 06:49, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 06:49, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 06:49, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Fiddle Faddle 06:49, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note Only "films" should be listed in the "list of Film-related deletion discussions" per WP:DSFILM. People, such as cinematographers/actors/directors, should only be listed in "list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions" and not the Film-related deletion discussion. Thank you. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:44, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Donaldd23, No good deed goes unpunished, I see. Perhaps you might delist it from that section? Fiddle Faddle 16:47, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's already there, so no harm, no foul. Just pointing it out for future reference. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:50, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Donaldd23, I used TW for AfDs, and it is not always made obvious what to add in. Is it preferable to leave that element less filled when unsure? Fiddle Faddle 17:00, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:50, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — Nom pretty much sums it up. I too can not locate in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources pertaining to subject of our discussion. Celestina007 (talk) 20:00, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.