Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajendra Nagar, Indore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. After being listed since 16 June, there hasn't been a delete !vote. (non-admin closure) Dusti^*poke* 00:30, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rajendra Nagar, Indore[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references exist for aforementioned article place. Also most of the information included in article seems to be personal thought rather verifiable information. No citation exist, lot of advertising for some private colleges done. Article is written as an essay. Abu Torsam 13:46, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and Cleanup If other Indore suburbs have articles, then this one can too. There are probably many reliable sources out there on this little suburb, therefore it does not fail WP:GNG. However, it does look a lot like an essay and WP:OR, so it needs major cleanup. Citrusbowler (talk) (contribs) (email me) 15:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 13:42, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 18:38, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - a quick look shows that there are multiple references and that the place exists. AFD is not an appropriate treatment for this kind of article, I propose that it be marked Unreferenced instead. Imc (talk) 13:05, 6 July 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.