Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raja Rajan Gopaldas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Raja Rajan Gopaldas[edit]
Delete due to insufficient reliable sources indicating why this person meets WP:BIO. Claims seem to be: winning the most medals within his college, a few mentions in the paper (in a section even the paper calls "Madras Miscellany" and which is refuted in another article, so reliability is an issue), and winning a residents' trivia competition (twice!). Unsure of speedy status, but given the benefit of the doubt and brought here. Reads like a suspected WP:COI page. Best of luck to him, but does not appear notable in the medical field yet, based on Google and/or Google scholar. --Kinu t/c 16:07, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete A google search shows up only two hits for this subject. Moreover, I am not sure if the website www.hinduonnet.com can be defined as a reliable source. --Siva1979Talk to me 16:16, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete article full of obvious (self)promotion. In addition to this we don't have articles on every person ever admitted into a certain educational programme, every person who ever published an article or every person who ever won a trivia contest even if it was two times!. MartinDK 16:22, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm from India, and the magazine he has been featured in is tiny by circulation, and does not have high editorial controls. Further, the trivia competition is not by any body I have heard of. And finally, in the larger scheme of things, he has not accomplished anything which several hundred thousand other Indians may not: won a prize, and mentioned in a local paper. Does not qualify as per Wikipedia:notable Iipmstudent9 18:29, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not an article. Danny Lilithborne 20:15, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The author of this article has expressed some concerns about this AfD, which I have responded to at the talk page for the article. I have referred him to the AfD if he wishes to make his case after familiarizing himself with the policies and guidelines cited therein. --Kinu t/c 21:20, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- Mereda 08:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. CRGreathouse (t | c) 09:43, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.