Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raja Narsa Goud

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 01:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Raja Narsa Goud[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unreferenced glory page about "one of the richest men of the then princely state of Hyderabad, Deccan". Tagged for problems since 2007. - Altenmann >t 07:13, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable, no references, vanity. This author seems to be bent on creating articles about members of the Goud family, all of which have been deleted. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:17, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vanity article--Sodabottle (talk) 09:02, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as mentioned above, smacks of vanity. Nothing really notable included, doesn't appear to pass WP:ANYBIO. Cocytus [»talk«] 01:38, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete Some snippets on Google books suggest there was a philanthropist by the name Narsa Goud (also spelled Narsagoud), who may be notable, but the available information is insufficient to establish notability. So it may be best to delete this unsourced and hagiographic article for now, and recreate an encyclopedic entry, if and when sources can be accessed. Abecedare (talk) 04:02, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.