Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raja Erij Zaman Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Presumably no prejudice against recreation / undeletion so long as requests for doing so can demonstrate that it meets our policy of verifiability. slakr^\ talk / 10:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Raja Erij Zaman Khan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not 100% this isn't a hoax but even if it isn't there is a complete lack of reliable sources and my search for any was fruitless. The most promising source that I located here actually used Wikipedia as a source and the Wikipedia page predates its creation. J04n(talk page) 20:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. J04n(talk page) 20:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. J04n(talk page) 20:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. J04n(talk page) 20:08, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm also striking out finding any reliable sources here. Nwlaw63 (talk) 01:53, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep English language search engines probably aren't the best places to find sources about a Pakistani clan chief. But, as a member of the West Pakistan legislative assembly, he would pass WP:POLITICIAN. Tiller54 (talk) 14:53, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To Tiller54: How do we know that if we don't have a reliable source? If we do have a reliable source why don't we add it to the article? --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 15:54, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without being given this persons name in the local languages and scripts there is no way we can check for sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:19, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per @Stuartyeates rationale. Quis separabit? 17:06, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Also not able to find anything, remains unsourced unfortunately. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 05:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.