Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raja Chaudhary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#4. Any editor in good standing may re-nominate the article for deletion. ✗plicit 01:22, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Raja Chaudhary[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

it fails WP:GNG and has lack of reliable sources and also fails WP:NACTOR Preetykaur761 (talk) 20:28, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep May fail WP:NACTOR or not, but I believe he meets WP:GNG simply because there is a lot of media coverage that – for whatever reason – is not in the article atm. It seems to mostly affect his personal life, but well it's a sort of fame I guess. Just from a quick search, some examples: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] --LordPeterII (talk) 18:45, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: FYI - the nominator has been blocked as a sockpuppet of a banned user - [7] Ravensfire (talk) 14:47, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.