Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainy Monday

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JForget 01:07, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rainy Monday[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NSONGS no context, no notability cited, no referance, article has nothing but a sentance. Alan - talk 21:42, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 22:35, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The song charted and is sufficiently notable to pass WP:NSONGS. My admittedly quick search for coverage included finds of a couple short reviews [1][2], and I'm thinking the article simply needs work (i.e., sources), not deletion. Gongshow ^Talk 10:19, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Criterion 1 and charting.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:34, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Charted, so meets WP:NSONGS. Rlendog (talk) 01:51, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.