Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raina Hein

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to America's Next Top Model (cycle 14). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Raina Hein[edit]

Raina Hein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. All sources are primary. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:33, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Being the runner-up in a reality show is not an automatic inclusion freebie that exempts a person from having to have enough reliable source coverage in real media to clear WP:GNG — but the only thing here that isn't a primary source is still an invalid source, because it's a WordPress blog and those don't count for squat either. And while I'll grant that it's not blatant enough to trigger my speedy deletion reflex, there is a not insignificant advertorial spin present here too. Bearcat (talk) 02:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to America's Next Top Model (cycle 14) per WP:ATD-R. Plausible search term even if not notable enough for a stand-alone article. Should have been redirected by the nominator per WP:BEFORE C.4 instead of bringing it here. Regards SoWhy 07:36, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.