Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Railpower GGS2000D

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Railpower Technologies#Green Goat Hybrid switchers. Sandstein 08:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Railpower GGS2000D[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has no sources, and no sources online available aside from this webpage, as it is a pretty obscure locomotive model. 𝕒𝕥𝕠𝕞𝕚𝕔𝕕𝕣𝕒𝕘𝕠𝕟𝟙𝟛𝟞 🗨️ 🖊️ 20:13, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:37, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Railpower Technologies#Green Goat Hybrid switchers, where it is very briefly mentioned. There's not any sourced material to be merged, but the locomotive is at least a plausible search term. And for that matter, redirect Railpower GG10B too, which is even worse than this article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Railpower GG20B. All the Railmotor hybrid locomotives should live in the same article and the GG20B in the main production model with its infobox is the main variant and tech is relevant. (I'm not sure I would have added that source one hour ago had I realised Trainsandotherthings had posted here 8 hours ago but my focus was get source(s) about Railpower GGS2000D first and ask questions later ... And I was prepping a book source but as last moment noticed Lulu it wouldn't stick). Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 00:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as multiple redirect/merge targets have been proposed
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:37, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Railpower Technologies. Not notable enough for its own article but could still be searched for. Against merging as apart from the first sentence, it's all unsourced and so the information shouldn't be merged unless reliable sources can be found. Suonii180 (talk) 01:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.