The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus; default to keep. Johnleemk | Talk 14:26, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails Google test San Saba 19:39, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete same reason. --Macrowiz 19:49, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, obscure. Gazpacho 22:21, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It exists ok - see the links in the article and de. wiki [1]. There is some precedent for keeping these towers see Krawutschke Tower which seem to be part of somebody's pet project. Dlyons493Talk 23:34, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep we have plenty other articles on this type of thing Jcuk 01:42, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
