Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul Pillai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 16:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rahul Pillai[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person has played only acted in a single movie and is not notable enough. No enough references to prove his notablity. Fails notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT) CRICKETMANAIC303 CRICKETMANIAC303 (talk) 16:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: One notable role and its associated press probably does not meet our standards. Jupitus Smart 02:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of independent and reliable references. Niceguylucky (talk) 13:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG,WP:NACTOR there are no significant roles in movies Padavalam🌂 ► 16:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability.Fatzaof (talk) 18:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.