Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahil Gupta

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by Bishonen per CSD A7. (non-admin closure) BethNaught (talk) 15:15, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rahil Gupta[edit]

Rahil Gupta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason - No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events) WP:A7 was removed without explanation Mosfetfaser (talk) 09:45, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep Rahil Gupta The article had everything in the start , it could be a motivation to millitant hit citizens of Jammu kashmir.With consistentb edits it has been reduce. The first work by AnomieBOT was the bestand then so many unwanted changes and may be why two-three users want to get it deleted under category of notability , i am not sure. If he cant fall under this category , then I am sorry.

Arjun7007 (talk) 10:24, 7 June 2014 (UTC) Arjun7007 (talk) 10:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC[reply]

*keep why this is done I am not sure. Everything is there from references to sources<>he is an important figure in J&K , keeping the work he has done there and provided lot of job opportunities to people of J&K. His work makes him entitled to be present on wikipedia

Tilkat (talk) 10:13, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep the topic is perfect Nomoskedasticity

Shaney 43 (talk) 10:58, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. All sources are either primary or seem to be reiterations of "Man opens coffee shop in Kenya". In that light, fails WP:GNG in my eyes. Dolescum (talk) 11:02, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Sources are primary and secondary as well, where external links put were deleted . :" It is an achievement for 28 year old from state without any facilities to go international and also He is the editor in chief on one of the most liked newspaper and page Cross town News " These facts are enough to keep the topic.

Arjun7007 (talk) 11:28, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, screaming keep repeatedly isn't going to help you. You get one !vote to make your case based on policy. Secondly, as NeilN has already stated on your talk page, the source you've supplied are all adverts, apart from this one which does not even mention the subject of your article at all!. Dolescum (talk) 11:40, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Dolescum What screaming. These are not adverts but press releases . and National level newspapers do not tell lie. If that is the case many articles on wikipedia will also be put under the hammer of deletion then. And as far as deletion is concerned people will vote for me as I am right in this case.

Arjun7007 (talk) 11:46, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arjun7007 (talk) 11:46, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, to use your own words, they're press releases. Please click here and read the fourth bullet point entitled "Independent of the subject". Dolescum (talk) 11:50, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Dolescum  : : I did not gave wordings to these big newspapers. They wrote what they felt like. I am not Editor of all these newspaper and big Blogs like Coffee industry and India hospitality review. He rahil gupta got coverage from all of them . check the external links that i have put in which you guys kept on editing.

Arjun7007 (talk) 11:55, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep the topic is perfect . It has everything which can come in notability Nomoskedasticity

Shaney 43 (talk) 10:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. This AfD is a complete mess. Arjun7007 (talk · contribs) and Shaney 43 (talk · contribs), please stop voting repeatedly and messing up the formatting. You get to vote once. I have slightly edited the AfD header itself to remove formatting errors, and I have moved a vote from the header into the body. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:19, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NinjaRobotPirate : This is simply a newspaper coverage which can be termed Press release or not , i do not know.YOU guys are using press release , So i used it . these are proper newspaper coverage . And for your knowledge please check WP:42 , NEWSPAPER ARE CONSIDERED AS RELIABLE SOURCES . SO why a mess is being created for deleting the article.So everybody should vote to keep the artcile

Arjun7007 (talk) 12:27, 7 June 2014 (UTC)— Arjun7007 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

  • Delete, entirely unremarkable businessman. One award from his old college is not enough to establish notability.TheLongTone (talk) 12:37, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Incidental coverage from independent sources is not quite enough to establish notability. --NeilN talk to me 12:49, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep Newspaper are the reliable sources . And also in newspaper stories it is clearly evident that he has got awards from IBSAA and others . Also check his facebook pages of Coffeee9 and Cross town news , he seems a local hero.

Shaili 890 (talk) 14:04, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep Independent sources as well as proper documents . Jammu & kashmir is India , I have been there and very few people make a name . He seems to be doing very good .

Monicaaus (talk) 14:10, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep. He is a businessman and an editor in chief oa newspaper , i just saw on links. keep him here for wikipedia as we need more new stuff and growing persons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mytray (talk • contribs) 14:16, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • CommentLast three contibutions are by freshly created accounts: indeed to date this is Mytray's only edit. .TheLongTone (talk) 15:14, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep The author has written well and has taken reliable sources of Newspaper.

Jammuindia (talk) 15:52, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep My contribution is on the fact that I think Article Rahil gupta is ok with notability parameters and should be kept.

Mooretrop (talk) 15:58, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another two freshly created accounts.TheLongTone (talk) 16:19, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Loving the SPA's here!, Anyway Delete as non notable person!. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 18:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: the sources are either press releases, incidental mentions of the person, or articles consisting of quasi-interviews where his words are wrapped in a thin layer of journalism, such that it is basically just his words. Notability is not established. BethNaught (talk) 18:40, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - as per previous posts, the sources do not qualify as reliable sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:51, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Sock-puppetry is not an effective way to influence a deletion discussion. Also, there is a discussion of this article at WP:ANEW. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:51, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - There is a related sockpuppetry case open as well. Additionally, seeing the excessive amount of sockpuppets i have semi protected the AFD for the rest of the week. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 20:27, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails BIO. Seems notable only to the SPA's. SW3 5DL (talk) 23:22, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wow looking at so many not so helpful Keeps, I agree, this once should be deleted and so should the "Sock Users" be blocked along with the "IP" to make sure no more of such cock-a-doodle-doo-doo disruption is happening.
As for the person, I too live in India, but in my own opinion (it is my personal opinion), here, people can become (read do becomes for god does not even know why reason) one time local hero by doing any thing, in order of doing a few things is one point to note which does not make a persons article worth; local news can publish what they think would help in their benefit do anything, as the current market structure is very very competitive with everyone trying to hoard a place; so hopefully in order to sell, everything is posted for many days till the news becomes pricking. Danke Schôn. Vishal Bakhai - Works 06:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've speedied the article per WP:A7, no indication of importance. Indeed, per the original speedy template that was removed by one of the many many indefblocked socks haunting the article and this discussion. The alternative would be to semi the article and keep it until the inevitable "delete" close here, but what for? Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy. Bishonen | talk 15:00, 8 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rahil_Gupta&oldid=1077705916"