Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ragnhild Lorentzen (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Separately and editorially redirecting as suggested. Sandstein 12:39, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ragnhild Lorentzen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There was a discussion in 2009 that reached no consensus. (See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ragnhild Alexandra Lorentzen.) My own reading is that she's not notable enough — she's 66th on the succession list for the British throne, and presumably a lot higher on the Norwegian throne, but the article itself does not assert any other real claim to notability nor is there apparently any. I simply don't see it. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 04:20, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't understand why the last discussion reached a non consensus outcome, but the article's subject lacks sufficient coverage and notability to have its own article within wikipedia. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 04:46, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Further comment. As it turns out, my assumption that she's higher on the Norwegian succession list is wrong. Looks like she's not eligible for that throne at all. (See Line of succession to the Norwegian throne.) --Nlu (talk) 05:29, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, article shows no real accomplishments. Geschichte (talk) 20:45, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Princess Ragnhild, Mrs. Lorentzen or Delete. Notability is not inherited. I think there have been some interviews, mentions of her in Norwegian press, like in the Guardian article; this is mainly trivia and not significant coverage that would merit a stand-alone article per WP:GNG, but since all interviews are related to her family it might be enough for a redirect, like Brooklyn Beckham and Maud Angelica Behn. (I think the articleon the Lorentzen family probably should go too, as not many are independetly notable.)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.