Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radivision

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:29, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Radivision[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The company est. in 2017 with just 10 employees (Angel.com) doesn't meet company notability guidelines. And very promotional. Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:54, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. pure advertising from an editor moving his own contriutionds out of draft. No scope for improvement, because there is no notability either. DGG ( talk ) 01:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC) �[reply]
Delete. Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Agree that it is purely advertising - the username of the author is remarkably similar to the name of a Radivision employee. Jmertel23 (talk) 14:04, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Yep, totally promotional and doesn't meet WP:ORG. MutchyMan112 (talk) 14:36, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Apart from being totally promotional, largely the sources are either about the founder, or just a business analysis. Doesn't meet WP:NCORP totally. –Ammarpad (talk) 05:42, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.