Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radiopuhelimet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - Now there is enough consensus but is it possible to expand the article - there is only one textual line besides the templates, lists, etc.--JForget 23:50, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Radiopuhelimet[edit]

Fails WP:MUSIC, WP:N, and g-hits bring up little that is both secondary and reliable. Leonard^(Bloom) 04:00, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:BAND. -- Alexf⁴² 16:35, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I admit that the article is quite poor, so go ahead and delete if you want. However, the group itself might merit an article on Wikipedia (which is why I wrote the stub in the first place). At the moment I don't have the time to improve the article. --KFP (talk | contribs) 16:05, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:52, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:52, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Two albums on Sonet/Polygram and two more just on Sonet would seem to meet WP:MUSIC on "Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels". They have also toured internationally repeatedly.[1] Bondegezou (talk) 10:21, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:49, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There is a book about the band, in Finnish: J. A. Mäki ja Juha Hurme (toim.) (2006). Radiopuhelimet. Like. ISBN 952-471-714-X. --Eastmain (talk) 23:45, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:MUSIC#C5. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 03:31, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Solid keep; two albums released by Polygram satisfy the sufficient condition of criterion 5; Eastmain is an editor in good standing who asserts there is a book-length reference work on the topic. No reservations here. Skomorokh 12:57, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No-brainer Keep; several big-label, major-circulation albums, tours and tons of other coverage. And on top of that, I don't really follow popular music trends and I've heard of them too. =) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 16:25, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.