Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radar Recordings (3rd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:23, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Radar Recordings[edit]

Radar Recordings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Sources in the article are either unreliable or only provide passing mentions, and source searches are only providing passing mentions, such as this. North America1000 10:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:14, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:14, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:14, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- typical advertorial for an unremarkable label. As noted by the nom, sources are insufficient to meet CORPDEPTH and GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:10, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor Talk! 01:26, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment -- the nom and I often don't agree on what constitutes sufficient coverage to satisfy GNG and CORPDEPTH; so in this case, this is telling me that there's very little to go on. :-) . I cannot find any sources even if I search in combination with the artists that appeared on the label. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:37, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.