Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachyal (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:50, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rachyal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't verify its notability. Last AfD closed as no responses; sending WP:APPNOTE to Krishna Chaitanya Velaga. Boleyn (talk) 17:50, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Let's put it down for good, seemingly no references in sources and is literally 1 sentence. Layla, the remover (talk) 18:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOT and my statement in the first nomination. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:11, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it and expand it, one sentence is just the beginning.79.238.99.2 (talk) 16:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

79.238.99.2, why are you voting to keep? How do you feel it meets WP:NOTABILITY? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.