Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Saunders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Kansas USA. Sam Walton (talk) 10:35, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Saunders[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing she has done comes even marginally close to making her notable other than winning Miss Kansas USA, and that is not enough of its own to make someone notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ sometimes we keep articles on pageant winners, sometimes not. Although the article could use some editing, the issue here is notability. I'm finding articles in third party publications about the subject and therefore is enough to pass WP:GNG.--Paul McDonald (talk) 19:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I confess that I'm unable to repeat the results of my search when I posted this... I will strike.--Paul McDonald (talk) 18:24, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable enough for article; fails GNG Hawkeye75 (talk) 05:04, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Miss Kansas USA as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there as the 2005 winner. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:21, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BIO1E and a minor one at that. Trivial mentions and does not meet GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:10, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:00, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as per Northamerica1000.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:27, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect as having one model position as a state is not actually substantial or convincing for her own established independent notability as an article. SwisterTwister talk 17:22, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.