Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Ryan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bd2412 T 16:24, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Ryan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real assertions of notability in article and no reliable sources addresses Ryan's life or career in detail. Just coverage of her relationships with famous actors Michael Keaton and Richard Mulligan. Nobility is not inherited. Fails both GNG and PORNBIO. Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:05, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:08, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks non-trivial RS coverage to pass WP:BASIC. No claim for passing PORNBIO or any other secondary notability criteria. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:BASIC / WP:ENT. --K.e.coffman (talk) 17:35, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks the reliable sources required by the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:05, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete could not find reliable sources. Reddragon7 (talk) 04:15, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable for stand alone article, trivial. Kierzek (talk) 19:11, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Detele, fails WP:NPORN. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 13:54, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.