Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Rotten

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:25, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Rotten[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable pornstar failing pornbio and gng Spartaz ^Humbug! 12:22, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 13:03, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - notable. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 23:50, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discard per WP:ITSNOTABLE. Tarc (talk) 13:34, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom fails PORNBIO + GNG .–Davey2010^Talk 17:52, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO without award wins. Fails WP:GNG without significant coverage by reliable sources. Searches yield reprinted press releases and coverage about Rachel Rotten's ex-boyfriend. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Incidental coverage in sources discussing more well-know partner, but notability is not inherited. Fails Pornbio with only multiple award nominations, no wins. Tarc (talk) 13:34, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Gene93k's accurate analysis. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 02:16, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Gene93k and Tarc, notability is not inherited. Cavarrone 19:13, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.