Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Jacobs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @232 · 04:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Rachel Jacobs[edit]
- Rachel Jacobs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete: (along with Parker Jacobs; see below) non-notable actor [email protected] (talk) 18:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Also let's consider whether her brother Parker Jacobs qualifies as notable. His page only indicates that he is a Mormon graphics artist, from what I can decipher. [email protected] (talk) 18:41, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing I can find indicates notabilty; also per RMS Parker Jacobs should AfD too. Fuzbaby (talk) 20:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Can't find any sources to establish notability, subject doesn't meet WP:ENTERTAINER. I would think the Parker Jacobs article qualifies for speedy deletion, as nothing in it seems to assert notability. Rnb (talk) 21:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I don't see the notability. I can't see her passing WP:ENT. If she has had all the roles Rms125a says, and he puts them in the article, I'd be willing to reconsider. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:00, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree with Fuzbaby. Nothing notable came up during a google search. There are a lot of young children actors popping up on wiki that go into AfD. I think a PR company and/or management firm creates their articles; very suspect. BioDetective2508 (talk) 01:02, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.