Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel C. Smith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 13:03, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel C. Smith[edit]

No or marginal encyclopedic value, appears to fail WP:BIO. Most things mentioned in the article (doctoral candidate, 72nd female smokejumper, etc) are not notable at all. The academic papers and speaking might be notable but even they don't seem like encyclopedic material. What do you think? Dragomiloff 23:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Would be an interesting person to meet, but fails WP:PROFTEST. I don't see the encyclopedic value of "youngest smallest" smokejumper (as of 2003) either. Wikipedia is not the Guiness Book of Records Bwithh 00:14, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete appears to fail WP:BIO despite being a very interesting individual, though there may be more here that is notable. Canadian-Bacon 00:35, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete per Can-Bacon. Strong as a resume, not apparently notable. --Dhartung | Talk 01:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, really not encyclopedic. SkierRMH,07:05, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable, and as pointed out above by Dhartung it appears to be a CV. DrKiernan 12:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.