Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raceroom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 12:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Raceroom[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. No references. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:55, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:57, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 12:26, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - if it were a recent release and we could expect references, that's one thing. But a three year old game? If it were notable, we'd have more to go on. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 15:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Covered by multiple reliable sources.[1][2][3][4] - hahnch e n 20:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Hahnchen - a quick Google search finds a lot of sources discussing the game, as Hahnchen pointed out. Notability is permanent and given the coverage it has received I'd be hesitant to delete this. NottNott|talk 12:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.