Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Race queen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Promotional model. Sandstein 16:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Race queen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is only one reference in the whole article. The topic doesn't even qualify for WP:NOT Coderzombie (talk) 14:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I thought that there would be some better sources than the ones in the article available, but if there are I can't find them between the Urban dictionary definitions and the pornography. I'm not sure which part of WP:NOT the nominator thinks the article breaks, but it doesn't seem to be notable... Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 10:51, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Promotional model where race queens are mentioned. A search shows that his is a real profession that modeling agencies advertise for and that the practice of having race queens is controversial. But I haven't been able to find any in depth RS about race queens or race models in particular. A race queen is a type of promotional model, and Promotional model mentions the topic with what seems like due weight for that article. Because this is a plausible search term, a redirect is warranted. --Mark viking (talk) 18:48, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as this seems sufficiently connected. SwisterTwister talk 04:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.