Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabra Family

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:10, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rabra Family[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing enough of a claim to significance for this family here. I also believe that WP:NOTGENEALOGY applies. Moved prematurely over from Draft:Rabra Family without making any attempt at addressing the issues that led to the AfC decline. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:20, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Pakistan, India, and Punjab. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:20, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Note that the article Rabra has already been deleted. gidonb (talk) 11:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There is no indication that this family – or any of its members, for that matter – have received significant coverage in independent reliable sources. While genealogical information can be included in an article about a notable subject, WP:NOTGENEALOGY is clear that this sort of stand-alone family tree is not encyclopedic. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.