Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabbits on the run
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was KEEP. Kevin (talk) 00:32, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rabbits on the run[edit]
- Rabbits on the run (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Disputed prod; unreleased album without major 3rd party coverage. An anonymous IP removed the prod tag and inserted references, but all of the references are the artists twitter status updates rather than WP:RS's. (Per WP:Notability (music) unreleased albums without major coverage are not notable.) Kevin (talk) 20:40, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
More citations have been added to hopefully settle any uncertainty about Twitter reliability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack-tr (talk • contribs) 21:01, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The major single from the album is scheduled to be released four days after this AFD is scheduled to close. It's pretty clearly going to be notable within a week after this AFD closes (it's Vanessa Carleton). What's the point in deleting it only to undelete it in a week? NW (Talk) 00:03, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You know, apparently I'm bad at looking at dates. Since there are no deletes other than me, seeing if I can figure out how to close it. Kevin (talk) 00:32, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.