Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rab Corbett
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:30, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Rab Corbett[edit]
- Rab Corbett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable prank. Zero ghits on Books or Scholar. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 20:18, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable at all. -- Jack?! 20:44, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per nom. Dewritech (talk) 20:59, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. Looks like self-glorification at its worst. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 18:30, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy deletion candidate in my view - possible G3, borderline G11, definite A7. Ben MacDui 20:25, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - lacks coverage in reliable sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 16:37, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.