Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RaShawn McAllister

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 20:38, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RaShawn McAllister[edit]

Fails WP:BIO as not a professional athlete, nor amateur who has competed at highest level of competition, nor has enough WP:RS with substantial coverage of the subject. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:23, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-notable collegiate athlete, 78 G-hits, fails to satisfy WP:ATHLETE. Appears to be an autobiography. Accurizer (talk) 09:26, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 10:26, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:BIO per nom. RS coverage is of a routine nature (game coverage and team roster changes). • Gene93k (talk) 10:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- correction: I did find one non-routine hit, his entry to the NBA Development League in 2007. That was it. • Gene93k (talk) 20:35, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The article barely asserts notability. The citations are weak: [1] and [2] mention McAllister in passing; the four iblhoopsonline.com references spell his name differently each time, indicative of little fact checking. —EncMstr (talk) 13:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article does not clear notability concerns and also does not clear WP:BIO Edeskonline (talk) 13:47, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, if the best he could do was Southern Oregon and the IBL, he fails WP:ATHLETE. Corvus cornix_talk 18:47, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.