Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raʽad Rehabilitation Goodwill Complex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:11, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Raʽad Rehabilitation Goodwill Complex[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Nothing in gnews, a plain google search yields very little. Unless someone can find coverage in Persian. LibStar (talk) 22:36, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete under criteria G12 and per WP:CPI. Most of the article seems to be copied from the organization's website, and looking through the article history, there doesn't seem to be a "last good version" that can be reverted to, nor is the non-copied content enough to support the article. MaterialWorks _(talk) 00:04, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Disability, Organizations, and Iran. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:22, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, per MaterialWorks. Likely copyright violation. EnIRtpf09b^{chat with me} 09:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Speed Delete - no comment BeenDominic (talk) 18:54, 6 February 2023 (UTC) — BeenDominic (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete as WP:ORG fail. Fad Ariff (talk) 12:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT, WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:NCORP, and GNG. This is just a wall of text, possibly original research or copyvio, but in any case, it is a mess that needs to be blown up. We have ever been a web host, for which this person is using us. There is no way this passes our standards for NGOs. There is a single source, which makes it essentially plagiarism. Bearian (talk) 13:39, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:47, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.