Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RPD Entertainment Ltd.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. CSD G5, sock of User:Raliegofficial22 Liz Read! Talk! 02:46, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
RPD Entertainment Ltd.[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- RPD Entertainment Ltd. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable record company. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RALIE G (Rapper) who owns the company. ... discospinster talk 22:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Strong delete. If I hadn't nominated the RALIE G article for AfD, I would speedy delete this article as an utterly non-notable company without any trace of reliable sources. (The sources in the article are self-published or don't check out.) —C.Fred (talk) 22:36, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Also see RALIE G (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Raliegofficial22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). The article may have been created by a sockpuppet of a blocked user. —C.Fred (talk) 22:49, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and South Africa. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:04, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. citations are not good. One was from 1962 Billboard, so it was not for thr same company, so I removed it.Threevian (talk) 02:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. For the aforementioned reasons. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- As a note to those who have raised issues about sources, at the time I write this, the only sources in the article are primary sources. —C.Fred (talk) 12:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. per nom, as well as salted article. Silikonz💬 02:06, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Devokewater 16:13, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- Strong delete. Absolutely non-notable. Fails WP:GNG. --Kinu t/c 22:30, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.