Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/REWIND (film

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. A7 Tone 15:08, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

REWIND (film[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by author. A film that has not even been officially announced yet. No indication of who is making it or who is in it. Speculative, unreferenced and unverifiable. DanielRigal (talk) 00:57, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —DanielRigal (talk) 00:59, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Appears to qualify as a speedy. In all likelihood, it's the author's personal project or a hoax. PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:06, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as waaaaaaaay WP:TOOSOON. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:35, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - What can I really say, it has no sources, it's 2 years too early, it's not even stub class. For all intents and purposes it's an article about a subject that does not exist. - OldManNeptune ⚓ 06:07, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of above. --Stickee (talk) 06:13, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete film that has yet to be released or verified. The name doesn't help in searching. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:30, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.