Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RE:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A redirect to Reply is an editorial choice and can be done by anyone subsequent to this closure. Mkdw ^talk 03:20, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RE:[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still no credible claims to notability. The one possible notable reference (the V&A museum) fails to mention RE:.

Note that a previous speedy deletion tag was removed by a newly-created user three minutes after I added it. Lithopsian (talk) 19:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The speedy deletion tag was removed by this user, as the article clearly demonstrates notability, both in terms of being a 'well known' design practice in the UK and France, and their work in Cyprus. I would suggest that the article requires considerable improvement and that some references are not relevant.HBM75018 (talk) 21:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)HBM75018[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect to Reply as a reasonable search term (particularly for non-English speakers). KaisaL (talk) 02:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of significant coverage in independent reliable sources sufficient to meet the Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) guideline. Qwfp (talk) 13:09, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- typical advertorial; does not have sufficient RS to meet GNG and CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.