Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. Amarendran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) buidhe 02:47, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

R. Amarendran

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

R. Amarendran (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unknown actor. His films are famous, but his roles are tiny. DragoMynaa (talk) 00:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 00:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 00:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 00:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

• Weak Keep: I can't agree with the nominator that the subject's roles are tiny; he has main/supporting roles in Vidiyum Munn, Jil Jung Juk and, to a lesser extent, Kabali, so I think a weak case could be made for WP:NACTOR. As for sources, there are some Times of India articles online, but I am not sure how reliable "Times of India" is and would welcome others' opinions on that point. Dflaw4 (talk) 13:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

  Dflaw4, according to WP:RSN, Times of India is better than most Indian media, and it can be used in articles. buidhe 16:46, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

• Great! Thanks, buidhe. Dflaw4 (talk) 22:02, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

• Keep passes WP:NACTOR with some prominent roles and has reliable sources coverage in newspapers such as The Hindu, Times of India and others so deletion is unnecessary, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 18:26, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:25, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

• Keep. This meets the demands of WP:SIGCOV and WP:NACTOR.Quarterto500 (talk) 11:29, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.