Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Réplica (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Carlosguitar ^{(ready and willing)} 11:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Réplica (band)[edit]

Little web hits. Doesn't even have their own website - using Myspace. nothing comes up for News search of Replica and noiselab (their label). WP:MUSIC says no. Montchav (talk) 20:12, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable band. I want to point out: not having a MySpace page for their band isn't a big deal though. Many bands (notable or not) don't use MySpace. RobJ1981 (talk) 00:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I think the point was that the band does not have its own web site, and uses MySpace a its only web presence. In other words, they're too cheap to spring for "replicaband.com" or some such. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 13:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 13:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no reliable sources -- Whpq (talk) 17:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep Between their discography with Noiselab and the reviews in the "features" section, they seem to squeak by WP:MUSIC. SingCal (talk) 02:02, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete They seem to miss the notability level for inclusion here. --Stormbay (talk) 15:40, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.