Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R&P Electronic Media

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:39, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

R&P Electronic Media[edit]

R&P Electronic Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since creation in February 2015. I could find nothing about either this company or its parent RPL Interactive Group (mentioned in the last paragraph). Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 17:46, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 18:34, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 18:34, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 18:34, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 18:34, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - does not meet WP:GNG (has not "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject") or WP:ORGSIG (no "significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education.") - therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk) 20:56, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: The article's Marketing Campaigns section makes several uncited claims of notability, but even if supporting references were found, these would not be inherently demonstrating encyclopaedic notability. I am seeing nothing from searches more than passing mentions indicating a company which was going about its business; nothing meeting WP:NCORP requirements. AllyD (talk) 14:37, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.