Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quizone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 22:59, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quizone[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sourced only to the network. That link doesn't even work. No indication that it's even shown anymore or that it's notable. Greykit (talk) 23:00, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:06, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Can't find anything at all, Nothing on on GNews so will have to say Delete. –Davey2010^Talk 05:26, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm not blown away by the content by any means. but when I search the category "Category:Irish children's television programmes" It's not that much worse then the other articles there, This is why I think having Catagories instead of articles can be dangerous. If we had an article for Irish children's television programmes This show could have a paragraph in that article. as is, the only choice they have is to be a stub. given the state of the article as a hole I'd say hold off on deletion but a lot of articles in that category are pretty sparse and could use some help. Bryce Carmony (talk) 13:39, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Other stuff exists. Even so, and referring to the other contents of that category, this is a particularly poorly sourced one which is rife with original research and asserts no notability, the website doesn't work anymore and it no longer appears to be shown. Aifric, for instance, has at least one award. Best Bitz from Back Den has two sources. Custer's Last Stand-up has a BAFTA. Dáithí Lacha's sources date from the 1960s, 1970s and 1990s and is the country's "first home-grown television cartoon star". The Morbegs has three sources. Pic Me is an award winner and globally distributed. Roy has a BAFTA. Quizone doesn't (yet?) compare. --Greykit (talk) 20:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

07:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.