Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quintetto Chigiano

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) lettherebedarklight, 晚安, おやすみなさい, ping me when replying 09:19, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quintetto Chigiano[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Quintetto Chigiano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails wp:nband. lettherebedarklight, 晚安, おやすみなさい, ping me when replying 12:56, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep and tag for additional refs and inline citations. The article on the Quintetto Chigiano was written as a "starter" stub several years ago, and needs more adequate verification sources listed inline: I agree. However it was certainly a notable classical ensemble, and if the page is removed it will in due course be necessary to replace it. As it stands, the reference listed under "Sources" as Sackville-West and Shawe-Taylor, together with the selection of Decca recordings listed with their reference data, ought to be sufficient to verify their notability for the purposes of a "stub", which this is. I suggest that, rather than deletion, it would be more useful and appropriate to tag the page with a request for (a) additional references and (b) more specific inline citation, and allow a further amount of additional time for these to be found and added.Eebahgum (talk) 14:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have enlarged the data and improved the references. Eebahgum (talk) 17:01, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I added two refs to their recordings, from notable publishers. Reading this, I understand that Ginastera dedicated a work to them. Notable, no doubt. Just improve the article. I have no time right now. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    adding: lettherebedarklight, I consider this nomination an unfunny joke. This isn't a band but a Classical music ensemble, - please inform that project. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:11, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Gerda Arendt: wp:nband states Musicians or ensembles (emphasis mine).
    i shall notify the wikiproject promptly. lettherebedarklight, 晚安, おやすみなさい, ping me when replying 15:17, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – dozens of mentions just in the British press, including:
  • "a very notable chamber consort from Italy … [playing] with unanimity, extreme subtlety, and easy mastery that made their playing a delight to the ear" – The Times, 22 January 1949
  • "a team ranked among the finest players in Europe" – The Times, 24 October 1951
  • "The Italian Quintetto Chigiano has achieved a remarkable reputation in London for homogeneity, interpretation and technical ability" – Liverpool Echo, 24 October 1951
  • "one of the most notable ensembles in the history of chamber music" – Belfast Telegraph, 7 September 1959
  • "the incomparable Quintetto Chigiano in Dvořák's Piano Quintet, a performance so glorious that one feels one has never heard the work before" – Birmingham Daily Post, 13 December 1951
Notable beyond question. Tim riley talk 17:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Quintetto_Chigiano&oldid=1102292349"