Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quintanilla Middle School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 20:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quintanilla Middle School[edit]

Non notable middle school. Vegaswikian (talk) 08:06, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Some schools are in, some are out. Whats the point of that. Keep them all. scope_creep (talk) 12:04, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. —Camaron1 | Chris 12:24, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and disregard all proposals in this batch. I typed in the name of "Quintanilla Middle School" into Google. Not a lot of hits and this one is included. Obviosly a unique experiment with own web page etc. Surely the page could have been found by this nominator. Victuallers (talk) 14:53, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not a single notable point about this school, not even a weak attempt like quasi-notable alumni or statewide teaching awards. Also, all sources are from the school itself, which raises WP:V issues. CRGreathouse (t | c) 15:24, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep since they pioneered a project which may or may not be notable depending on how many schools adopted it and how much news coverage it had. Article can also be merged into school district. Nothing much to warrant a separate entry but we do have a district article that can cover the lot of them. - Mgm|^(talk) 15:43, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - undertaken a notable experiment that could have broader application. TerriersFan (talk) 01:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- How does that experiment make the school notable? Are they the first or only school to do this? Vegaswikian (talk) 03:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The only point about this school points toward possible future notability. At present, it is another non notable school. --Stormbay (talk) 22:24, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. First school to develop this project. Bearian (talk) 19:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.