Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quick Scoping

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 12:23, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quick Scoping[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Rationale was "Not WP:HOWTO. Not a game guide." I am neutral. Jujutacular ^talk 00:15, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a how to guide or a game guide. Jenks24 (talk) 03:55, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, obviously - it's just a game-playing "How To" guide -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Textbook example of a "how to" guide, which of course, Wikipedia is not. Dennis Brown (talk) 13:58, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my own PROD rationale (that I admittedly messed up at first). Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 19:21, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I originally marked this with a CSD when the article was create, which was switched to a PROD. Wildthing61476 (talk) 13:38, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTHOWTO. Cymru82 (talk) 17:25, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.