Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QuickRummy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 16:39, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

QuickRummy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:MADEUP. There's no evidence in google that this exists - there are numerous 'quick rummy' variants but none of them are the same as this one and there's no way to establish that this particular variant has any more notability than any of the others (and by 'any more', i mean 'any at all') TKK! bark with me if you're my dog! 20:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Rummy#Variants of Rummy. While this particular one may not meet notability, maybe people who search this may be looking for something else. Ansh6 6 6 20:46, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:55, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:MADEUP. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 13:29, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.