Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QuestFusion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♠ 05:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

QuestFusion[edit]

QuestFusion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems like a pure work of promotion. Not sure that the sources provided show it meets the WP:NORG criteria. Of the 12 sources provided 5 are written by the owner of the company, "prweb" "questfusion.hatenablog" "totugalogic" siliconcape" and "entrepreneur". 2 are interviews with 2 or 3 1-line questions and lots of PR blurb as answers "supercrew" and "thumbtack". 1 is a blog "startcatchup". 1 is a podcast interview "epodcastnetwork". 2 are business directories and nothing more "angel.co" and "crunchbase". the only one that seems to be neutral is "marketersmedia" Domdeparis (talk) 16:05, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 00:31, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep For a small company it has enough web references. I'd say we keep it. "Solana Beach Award" is enough for this kind of company. Dortar (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC) Note - This editor is the creator of the article. Exemplo347 (talk) 09:15, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Notability has not been established. Sources are a collection of PR guff. Wikipedia is not a directory for business listings. Exemplo347 (talk) 09:15, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing++ 17:34, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There is not one good secondary source available about the company. Notability cannot be inherited from mentions in an article about the owner. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:54, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.