Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quentin Carnaille

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 10:36, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quentin Carnaille[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Interesting work, but I don't see how he is yet notable DGG ( talk ) 22:40, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article is an incomprehensible mess of artspeak and the opinion of the author, not a summary of what reliable sources had to say about the subject. Unlike Apologie Magazine, La Voix du Nord is a RS, but that single source does not suffice to support notability. Mduvekot (talk) 19:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in agreement with Mduvekot, incomprehensible mess of artspeak is pretty much dead on and I'm not sure what in the article establishes notability. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete to be honest, it borders on WP:PROMO. Otherwise, it's not that great of an article, full of artspeak and no real evidence of notability. Worst case, this is a WP:TNT candidate, and if someone else can rewrite in a way that shows it should be in an encyclopedia, it can be included. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.