Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quentin Averhart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I could have relisted it in view that there are only two votes at the moment, but the arguments seem exhaustive.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:58, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quentin Averhart[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a contemporary comedian. Sources cited in the article are chiefly YouTube videos and the subject's own website: nothing that would support a claim of notability. Google searches for ("quentin averhart") and for (FunnyManQ)-- Averhart's stage name-- turn up no evidence of coverage in independent sources. Google News searches for the same terms yield no hits at all. Fairly clear WP:GNG failure. Article created by SPA User:Quentin Averhart. Ammodramus (talk) 00:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me What did he do now? 05:54, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment--Well that's weird--Quentin Averhart (the user) seems to have redirected his user and talk pages to the article on himself. Kind of the opposite of a usual cross-namespace redirect. Is this allowed? Jinkinson talk to me What did he do now? 05:56, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't find significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. I noticed the same thing when I recently declined the AfC submission on the same subject. EricEnfermero ^HOWDY! 08:03, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.