Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen Emma Preschool

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to St. Andrew's Priory School. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:23, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Queen Emma Preschool[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unlike high schools, preschools are not inherently notable. A Google search fails to find enough significant or reliable coverage for this one preschool. A possible mention in Honolulu's article (possibly including a redirect) or something similar should suffice. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:06, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No third-party sourcing or coverage to demonstrate any degree of notability. --DAJF (talk) 01:08, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 01:10, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:14, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I could not find any references to show notability. If we keep this though we can have possibly 110,000 future preschool articles. I suspect that articles like The College Preparatory School, that shows 61 references and a very quick glance of near 50% reference puffery and St. Andrew's Priory School with no references are in the same classification. WOW! I wish I hadn't saw this now because of all the "junk" school related articles. Otr500 (talk) 04:30, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to St. Andrew's Priory School. Delete per the above lack of sourcing, though "St. Andrew's Priory School" is a valid redirect, as an affiliated school. I would say that the delete is not even necessary and to go straight for the R, but it's easier with consensus to do this. czar ⨹ 17:14, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, probably to St. Andrew's Priory School, an article which describes the Queen Emma Preschool as one of its parts (in "Academics" section). But, per http://www.standrewsschools.org/, Queen Emma Preschool and St. Andrew's Priory (girls only) are 2 of 3 of the St. Andrew's Schools which also includes boys school. Preschool probably serves both the others. But redirect to girls-only one still seems okay as a choice. (By the way, negative comments above about St. Andrew's Priory School seems off-base; as the article states that the school was founded in 1867 by Queen Emma, wife of one of the Kamehameha kings; it is clearly important in Hawaiian history.) The Queen Emma Preschool article currently gives, in its infobox, http://www.standrewsschools.org/ as its webpage. Within that clicking on Queen Emma Preschool and further does not lead one to any mention when the pre-school was started. It was named for, not created by, Queen Emma. --do ncr am 15:43, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.